Matt is Moving to Seattle

Matt Gratt is a great technology marketing professional looking for a job in Seattle.

Matt Gratt is a great technology marketing professional looking for a job in Seattle.

I’m moving back to my hometown of Seattle on August 1st.

I’m leaving Ondeego – I’m really proud of what we’ve accomplished and I expect great things from that group in the near future, but it’s time for me to try something new.

Accordingly, I’m looking for employment in Seattle. I’m open to contract, full-time, consulting, and any other work that provides an interesting opportunity to grow my skills and deliver value to customers. I’ve set up a hire Matt page that has more information on my skills and background, and how to get in touch with me.

Seattle is a great place to live. I’m really looking forward to the change. Seattle and San Francisco are similar in a lot of ways, but the culture is fundamentally different – San Francisco is sort of hippy/libertarian/do-whatever-you-want and Seattle has more of a Scandinavian-Lutheran-hard working ethic to the people there. Everyone’s incredibly nice in Seattle. But I am very disappointed because the burritos are much better in San Francisco.

If you or someone you know needs a great technology marketing professional in Seattle (or the greater Seattle area), head on over to the Hire Matt page and set up an interview or phone call with me.

Photo: dherrera_96‘s flickr

What are some of the differences between Seattle and San Francisco? Which one is better? Where should Matt work? Leave a comment…

new experiments in productivity

I’ve decided to try to become more organized and productive.
Unlike many who with this aim, I have a profoundly different goal.  I do not want to be more productive and organized.  My productivity I would grade ‘Good’, while my organization I would grade merely ’Adequate’.
My goal is simply to expend less time to get the same results I get today.

Methods
I will not try to use GTD, because it is so difficult to implement.  I am familiar with GTD, I have read the book, and I think it is a good methodology.  Much of what I will do is based on the ideas in GTD.  But I’m not running the microwave division of General Electric, so I don’t need anything with flowcharts.  I need something simpler.

What I Will Do:

  • I wil use GMail and Ta Da List.
  • I will do the items on Ta Da List.
  • I will attempt to answer all of the emails, and do the action items associated with them.
  • If an action item is substantial, I will transfer it to the Ta Da list.
  • Once an email is answered, I will archive it.
  • I will aggressively archive emails that acquire no action.
  • I have also created a delegate and a ‘wait on’ tab, but I don’t do either of those very much.

Results So Far
So far, I have gotten to inbox 3 in my work email, inbox 6 in my bmic email, and inbox 4 in my personal email.  (And both of the personal action items involved copy editing manuscript portions.)

My TaDa List has 10 items in each category, and all of them are slowing getting done.  They are what Stephen Covey would call ‘Quadrant II’ items.

So far, it’s going well.

Will it work out long term?  I’ll let you know.

Do you use a productivity system?  How do you stay organized?  Does it work? Leave a comment…